On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:26:06PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2008 at 22:20:34 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > My package depends on ocaml-base-nox-3.10.0. The lintian check is > > obviously wrong since it does not allow for a versionend > > ocaml-base-nox package. I wonder what the right check would be: > > > > - if I undestand correctly the dependency must be on ocaml-base-nox, > > not on ocaml. Or is there is a case in which the ocaml package > > can provide the ocamlrun interpreter? > > None that I can think of.
I just see hat ocaml depends on ocaml-base-nox. however we do not seem to have a versionend ocaml package, so one would still need a dependency on ocaml-base-nox.N.NN.N to specify the version. > > - are there any reasons in which it makes sense to depend on > > ocaml-base-nox and not on ocaml-base-nox-N.NN.NN for > > packages that use #!/usr/binocamlrun scripts? I cannot think > > of one > > > > So, in my opinion the right lintian check would be to check for dependency > > on a package ocaml-base-nox-(\d\.)+. Or did I miss something? > > > It could be ocaml-base-(\d\.)+ if the program needs graphics stuff. Right. So, it should be ocaml-base(-nox)?-(\d\.)+ -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
