Hello, On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 12:46:00PM +0000, Ximin Luo wrote: > Mehdi Dogguy: > > On 06/11/2016 19:37, Ximin Luo wrote: > >> > >> OK. I'm doing the new package now. I'm going to rename some branches in > >> git, > >> atm it is a bit non-standard and confusing. > >> > > > > Can we discuss the renames you want to operate before doing it? > > > > What did you find non-standard? What is standard? > > > > Sorry, I did it already. It was: > > master -> debian/sid > upstream -> upstream/sid > experimental/master -> debian/experimental > experimental/upstream -> upstream/experimental > > I've seen this more often and the `gbp buildpackage` man page even names > debian/sid as an example. It also better matches the debian/stretch branch > that you added.
this naming schema makes sense, but it is not the one we have agreed on in the debian-ocaml-maint team. So far we have been using for all packages branches master and upstream for sid, and for all other distributions <distro>/master and <distro>/upstream. In my opinion it does not really matter which one we use, but it would be helpful to use the same naming schema for all packages. Cheers -Ralf.
