El 2026-02-06 a las 18:12 +0100, Rene Engelhard escribió:
> tag 1127307 - pending
> 
> tag 1127307 + moreinfo
> 
> thanks
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Am 06.02.26 um 18:00 schrieb Camaleón:
> > El 2026-02-06 a las 17:48 +0100, Rene Engelhard escribió:
> > 
> > tags 1127307 - moreinfo + pending
> 
> No, sorry, those have a meaning. It's definitely not "pending" an upload.
> 
> And moreinfo is still warranted until you did test it as you say later.. (And 
> if there is no problem it should just be closed after said info was given)

Understood (and sorry for the bad tagging).
 
> > > > It would be nice Debian binaries could bypass (whether possible) this
> > > > new and so perjudicial and restrictive requirement coming from LO's
> > > > default compilation options.
> > > As said, we don't use those mentioned in that bug.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > So what is your issue?
> > For now... NONE, as I have not YET tested Debian binaries O:-)
> Aha...
> > > Or are you just filing this because you *assume* whatever upstream did 
> > > affected us without even checking?
> > Yes, you're right.
> > 
> > I (wrongly) assumed the baseline of the DEB packages from upstream and
> > Debian will be the same but if this is not the case as you say, that
> > makes things a lot of better :-)
> > 
> > Okay, let me run some test this weekend with Debian's binaries and will
> > report here the results.
> 
> Please do.

GOOD news! It works, it works, it works! :-D

This bug can be closed (not a bug or whatever you prefer).

Reason: no need for wishing for a feature that is already present. 

Confirming Rene's statements, Debian's LibreOffice packages (26.2.x) are
using a different baseline than LO's one and thus, not applying/showing 
the upstream packages restrictions/limitations, at least the one for the
need of a «modern» CPU.

1. Proof of working / what I have done:

On my usual «oldie» (ahem) testing system, running Debian testing 
flavor, I have installed Sid (unstable) LibreOffice packages 
(now 26.2.0.3) and these packages are running and launching LO as 
expected.

2. Info / details:

****
Version: 26.2.0.3 (X86_64)
Build ID: 620(Build:3)
CPU threads: 2; OS: Linux 6.18; UI render: default; VCL: x11
Locale: es-ES (es_ES.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Debian package version: 4:26.2.0-1
Calc: threaded

testing@netbook:~$ uname -a
Linux netbook 6.18.5+deb14-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.18.5-1 
(2026-01-16) x86_64 GNU/Linux

testing@netbook:~$ dpkg -l | grep -i libc6:
ii  libc6:amd64                          2.42-11+b1          amd64      
  GNU C Library: Shared libraries

testing@netbook:~$ /usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --help | tail -4
Subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories, in priority order:
  x86-64-v4
  x86-64-v3
  x86-64-v2

testing@netbook:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -i name
model name    : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N455   @ 1.66GHz
model name    : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N455   @ 1.66GHz
****

Should additional information / tests are required just ask.

Just a final «wish» to LO package maintainers: keep this compilation 
options as much as you can to avoid premature / planned obsolescence!

Cheers,

-- 
Camaleón 

Reply via email to