Your message dated Sat, 7 Feb 2026 17:13:18 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1127307: Consider compiling LibreOffice 26.2.x to be
compatible with «old» systems/hardware/CPUs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1127307,
regarding Consider compiling LibreOffice 26.2.x to be compatible with «old»
systems/hardware/CPUs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1127307: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1127307
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libreoffice
Version: 4:26.2.0-1
Severity: wishlist
LibreOffice versions ≥ 26.2.x are not longer compatible with «old»
systems as it requires GLIBC > 2.31 and what is worse, a CPU with
specific flags/capabilities not present in legacy (?) hardware (see bug
report #169747¹ in LO's bugzilla and release notes²).
Being LibreOffice a critical and basic piece of software for many
mixed environments, such as home, professional and/or business users,
having no option for even running the software at all it becomes a
great lacking and forcing users with old hardware to look for another
alternatives.
It would be nice Debian binaries could bypass (whether possible) this
new and so perjudicial and restrictive requirement coming from LO's
default compilation options.
¹Bug 169747 - «CPU ISA level is lower than required»
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169747
²https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/26.2#Linux
Cheers,
--
Camaleón
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
notfound 1127307 4:26.2.0-1
thanks
Hi,
Am 07.02.26 um 17:10 schrieb Camaleón:
GOOD news! It works, it works, it works! :-D
This bug can be closed (not a bug or whatever you prefer).
OK, thanks for confirming.
Closing then.
Regards,
Rene
--- End Message ---
