Em Ter, 2004-01-06 �s 10:57, Joachim Breitner escreveu: > as HE pointed out, if we indeed enter [EMAIL PROTECTED] in > the Maintainer field for our packages, and we have a lot of packages, > then debian-perl might get a little too flooded by all kinds of > package-related mails. The gnome team has > [EMAIL PROTECTED], we could do the same > thing. Any comments?
Seems ok to me. > In my previous mail, I said the uploader should put himself into the > changelog. This is actually not needed, he should rather use > dpkg-buildpakge -k<his keyid> to build the package, and the person in > the changelog should be listed in "Uploaders:" (otherwise it would be a > NMU). ok also. > We also have to think about how we treat the debian revisions. When HE > changed the package a bit, he added a new entry to debian/changelog, > thus bumping the debian revision to -2 and tagged it > debian_version_0_71-2. I'd rather add lines to the current > debian/changelog entry, retag the sources (cvs tag -F > debian_version_0_71-1), and only bump the debian revision if we have > released a version. I think we could work the way cvs-buildpackage does... When an upstream version is dumped into cvs, the files (the orig, not debian control files) should be tagged as "upstream_version_0_71" then all the files (including debian control files) should be tagged as "debian_version_0_71-1" "...-2" "...-3". For each debian revision. and yes, the debian_version tag should only be made when there is a release to be done. In the case above (nomeata quote), there is no need to move the tag debian_version_0_71-1, just create a new tag debian_version_0_71_2. > This mail is a request for comments, so comment! :-) Here's mine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
