debian-policy  

Messages by Date

• 2001/05/24 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Arthur Korn
• 2001/05/24 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/24 CVS jdg: * Plug-ins != shared libraries (at last) closes: Bug#66023 debian-policy
• 2001/05/24 [[email protected]: [ANNOUNCE] FHS 2.2 Released] Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/24 CVS jdg: * Clarification of package priority issues vis-a-vis the X Windows debian-policy
• 2001/05/23 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/23 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Chris Waters
• 2001/05/23 Processed: Bug#72335: [PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/23 Processed: accepted! Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/23 Bug#72335: PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for debian/rules Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/23 Bug#72335: Does debhelper handle build-indep ? Peter S Galbraith
• 2001/05/23 Bug#66023: accepted! Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/23 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/23 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Thomas Smith
• 2001/05/23 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/23 Re: Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Edward C. Lang
• 2001/05/23 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/22 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Thomas Smith
• 2001/05/22 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/22 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Chris Waters
• 2001/05/22 Processed: #91257 accepted Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/22 #91257 accepted Branden Robinson
• 2001/05/22 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Raul Miller
• 2001/05/22 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/22 Processed: has two seconds Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/22 [no subject] John
• 2001/05/22 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Raul Miller
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Matthew Palmer
• 2001/05/21 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Chris Waters
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Raul Miller
• 2001/05/21 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/21 Bug#98291: being truthful about the FHS and us Chris Waters
• 2001/05/21 Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin Junichi Uekawa
• 2001/05/21 Bug#96873: Info received (was virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/21 Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin Anand Kumria
• 2001/05/21 Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin Junichi Uekawa
• 2001/05/21 Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Steve Greenland
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anton Zinoviev
• 2001/05/21 Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Patrik Hagglund
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Alexander Hvostov
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/21 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Adam Heath
• 2001/05/20 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Raul Miller
• 2001/05/20 Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Marcus Brinkmann
• 2001/05/20 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Joey Hess
• 2001/05/20 Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/20 Bug#87510: I second this proposal Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/20 Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Arthur Korn
• 2001/05/20 Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Zack Weinberg
• 2001/05/20 Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Arthur Korn
• 2001/05/19 Re: Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Herbert Xu
• 2001/05/19 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/19 Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/05/19 Tightening up specification of /bin/sh Zack Weinberg
• 2001/05/19 Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/19 Bug#87510: I second this proposal Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/19 Bug#87510: I second this proposal Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/19 Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/05/19 Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Richard Braakman
• 2001/05/19 Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/05/19 Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anton Zinoviev
• 2001/05/18 Bug#87510: I second this proposal Ben Collins
• 2001/05/18 Bug#87510: I second this proposal Peter Palfrader
• 2001/05/18 Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Arto Jantunen
• 2001/05/18 Bug#87510: I second this proposal Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/18 Re: Processed: policy proposal cleanup Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/18 Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Adam Di Carlo
• 2001/05/18 Processed: policy proposal cleanup Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/18 Bug#87510: I second this proposal Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/18 Bug#87510: I second this proposal Chris Waters
• 2001/05/17 Bug#87510: I second this proposal Adrian Bunk
• 2001/05/17 Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Adrian Bunk
• 2001/05/17 Re: Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Joey Hess
• 2001/05/17 Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/17 Processed: Re: Bug#97072: make amendment Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/17 Bug#97072: make amendment Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/17 Re: Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/05/17 Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Charles Briscoe-Smith
• 2001/05/17 Processed: 91252 accepted Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/17 91252 accepted Branden Robinson
• 2001/05/17 Processed: [AMENDMENT 17/05/2001] eliminating task packages; new task system Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/17 Bug#97755 acknowledged by developer ([AMENDMENT 17/05/2001] eliminating task packages; new task system) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/17 Bug#97755: [AMENDMENT 17/05/2001] eliminating task packages; new task system Joey Hess
• 2001/05/17 Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• 2001/05/17 CVS jdg: * Finished chapter 11 debian-policy
• 2001/05/17 Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/17 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Richard Braakman
• 2001/05/17 Bug#97755: PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Bas Zoetekouw
• 2001/05/16 Bug#97755: Acknowledgement ([PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/16 Bug#97755: [PROPOSAL] eliminating task packages; new task system Joey Hess
• 2001/05/16 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? John Galt
• 2001/05/16 CVS jdg: * Improving 11.1 -- 11.6 debian-policy
• 2001/05/16 Processed: Re: Bug#94995: [PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/16 Bug#94995: PROPOSAL] Clarifying instructions on linking man pages Colin Watson
• 2001/05/16 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Steve Greenland
• 2001/05/16 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Richard Braakman
• 2001/05/16 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Junichi Uekawa
• 2001/05/15 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Santiago Vila
• 2001/05/15 Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Joey Hess
• 2001/05/15 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/15 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Marco d'Itri
• 2001/05/14 Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Branden Robinson
• 2001/05/14 Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/14 Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Joey Hess
• 2001/05/14 Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Joey Hess
• 2001/05/14 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Adrian Bunk
• 2001/05/14 CVS jdg: * Improved 10.1.2 example (fixes bug#92744) debian-policy
• 2001/05/14 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/14 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Adrian Bunk
• 2001/05/14 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Colin Watson
• 2001/05/14 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/05/14 Re: Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/05/14 Is it allowed to remove old changelog entries? Adrian Bunk
• 2001/05/14 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/14 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/13 Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/05/13 Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Julian Gilbey
• 2001/05/13 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
• 2001/05/13 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/13 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
• 2001/05/13 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2001/05/13 Re: Use of Debian offical logo Colin Watson
• 2001/05/13 Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Peter Palfrader
• 2001/05/13 Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin Brian White
• 2001/05/13 Re: Finishing the FHS transition Colin Watson
• 2001/05/13 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/13 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
• 2001/05/13 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/13 Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Brian May
• 2001/05/12 Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Seth Arnold
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Seth Arnold
• 2001/05/12 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Karl M. Hegbloom
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
• 2001/05/12 Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
• 2001/05/12 Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Branden Robinson
• 2001/05/12 Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Joey Hess
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Herbert Xu
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Wichert Akkerman
• 2001/05/12 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Josip Rodin
• 2001/05/11 Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/11 Processed: this proposal becoming an amendment Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/11 Bug#91257: I always forget SOMETHING Branden Robinson
• 2001/05/11 this proposal becoming an amendment Branden Robinson
• 2001/05/11 Bug#91257: seconding this Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• 2001/05/11 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Marcelo E. Magallon
• 2001/05/11 RE: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2001/05/11 Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Wolfgang Sourdeau
• 2001/05/11 Software Engineers, Software Developers. Opportunity in Luxembourg Alex Jacobs
• 2001/05/11 Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Bernhard R. Link
• 2001/05/11 Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Michael Piefel
• 2001/05/10 ATTN: font package maintainers Branden Robinson
• 2001/05/10 Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/05/10 Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd) Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/05/10 Processed: make amendment Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2001/05/10 Bug#97072: make amendment Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/10 Re: reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Wolfgang Sourdeau
• 2001/05/10 Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
• 2001/05/10 Bug#97072: PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version Steve Greenland
• 2001/05/10 Bug#97072: [PROPOSED 2001/05/11] correct policy's comments on standards-version Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/10 reminder: menu icons should be 32x32 or smaller! Chris Waters
• 2001/05/10 Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd) Adrian Bunk
• 2001/05/10 Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd) Philippe Troin
• 2001/05/10 Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd) Joey Hess
• 2001/05/10 Re: Bug#96458: xv is NOT a native Debian package (fwd) Adrian Bunk
• 2001/05/10 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Branden Robinson
• 2001/05/10 Re: tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Arthur Korn
• 2001/05/10 Use of Debian offical logo Hisham Ismail
• 2001/05/09 tasks: counterproposal (and implimentation) Joey Hess
• 2001/05/09 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Marcelo E. Magallon
• 2001/05/09 Bug#96873: virtual-package names, ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin Junichi Uekawa
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Joey Hess
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Joey Hess
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Joey Hess
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Joey Hess
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Joey Hess
• 2001/05/08 Bug#53582: PROPOSAL] base section: let's get rid of this one at last Joey Hess
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Jason Gunthorpe
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Anthony Towns
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Jason Gunthorpe
• 2001/05/08 Re: Finishing the FHS transition Manoj Srivastava
• 2001/05/08 Re: "Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering" gone? Jason Gunthorpe
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Joey Hess
• 2001/05/08 Re: Tasks policy Joey Hess

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]