On Sun, 03 Apr 2005, Bill Allombert wrote: > For the record: > $ dpkg -L libxine1|grep /usr/share/doc > /usr/share/doc/xine [...] > Given the binary package 'xine' does not exist currently, I think this > is a policy violation due to namespace breakage.
Agreed. The directory would have to be named at least XINE or Xine to avoid such problems (in which case I don't think it violates policy, or at least not its spirit). That said, it is much better to have it all under libxine1. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
