On Fri, 06 May 2005, Joerg Sommer wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 03 Apr 2005, Bill Allombert wrote: > >> For the record: > >> $ dpkg -L libxine1|grep /usr/share/doc > >> /usr/share/doc/xine > > [...] > >> Given the binary package 'xine' does not exist currently, I think this > >> is a policy violation due to namespace breakage. > > > > Agreed. The directory would have to be named at least XINE or Xine to avoid > > such problems (in which case I don't think it violates policy, or at least > > not its spirit). > > > > That said, it is much better to have it all under libxine1. > > What is with /usr/share/doc/texmf? Is this legal?
Sort of. It has the same problem as the /usr/share/doc/xine dir, but the debian-tex maintainers keep control of it, so it is coordinated and no namespace clashes should happen. > > $ pkgof /usr/share/doc/texmf/ > tetex-base tetex-bin foiltex tetex-doc Try dlocate /usr/share/doc/texmf/, it gives you a better picture. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
