On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:07:01PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:37:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Both cases where I used 'must' do not make packages instantly buggy, > > since they only apply to the 'source' target (that is the idea, at > > least; if the wording isn't clear enough, I may need to fix that). If > > you don't have that target, you don't have to comply with the must. The > > 'source' target is a 'should', so a package that does not currently have > > this target isn't buggy at all. > > Yeah, but I know quite a few older packages that contain a snippet like: > source diff: > @echo >&2 'source and diff are obsolete - use dpkg-source -b'; false
Oh, right, forgot about that one. Overloading that would certainly not be a good idea. Hm. > Don't know why, this must be way before my time in Debian... > It would be good to check for the amount of packages affected by that > nevertheless. True. What I'm looking for is something unique; so 'source' is clearly right out. Perhaps 'edit' could be better, or 'finish'. Suggestions are most certainly welcome. -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
