On Jun 12, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to say the target should be > "patched", rather than "source". For reference, the proposal as it now > reads follows; as always, I'm looking for seconds. I object. If the standard "patched" target exists then README.source should not be needed.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
