Hi,
I have only passing interest in this topic, but I wanted to
point out that on *can* hold people resposible for things even i a
volunteer project (I most definitely am responsible for my packages),
we merely can not discipline them for failing to meet their
responsibilities, apart from the prospect of negative public
opinion. I think this is a distinction which is not unimportant.
Secondly, one can already make non-maintainer uploads when a
package needs it. No need for guilt trips.
We should consider hard before diluting the responsibilty for
a package.
One only needs look at the bug list for one of the peioneering
multi-maintainer packages (namely; dpkg) to think that possibly when
a goup is responsible for a package, in reality no one is responsible
for it.
manoj
down to one wishlist bug
--
He hath riches sufficient, who hath enough to be charitable. Sir
Thomas Browne
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
