Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One only needs look at the bug list for one of the peioneering > multi-maintainer packages (namely; dpkg) to think that possibly when > a goup is responsible for a package, in reality no one is > responsible for it.
This is IMHO a trite argument as it ignores the complexity of the multi-maintainer packages and the nature of the bugs. Also, though they aren't packages, several things can/will/would benefit from multiple maintainers (e.g. new-maintainer, pgp-update, ftp.debian.org). -- James
