Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> (1) There is nothing preventing the author from dashing off a
Raul> short note clarifying the issue. It's not like he's dead, or
Raul> contractually prohibited from participating, etc.
And he did.
Raul> (2) I have no personal objection to packages which only specify
Raul> three digits of policy version. For the purpose of tests we can
Raul> treat the missing digits as wild cards.
Which is what the changelog said in the first place, though
not in so many words.
Raul> (3) While the changelog entry implies that the fourth digit
Raul> could be ignored (it says that it's irrelevant), it explicitly
Raul> states that packages are *allowed* to specify only three digits,
Raul> which also implies that packages may meaningfully specify the
Raul> fourth digit. For this reason, the changelog entry is ambiguous.
Why is it ambiguous? Packages have been specifying all four
digits so far. The changelog hints at a relaxation of policy,
allowing packages to only specify 3 digits. It says so in (IMHO)
plain english.
You only need to get 50% to pass this test never ever suggest
that if you ace the test you fail.
Raul> (4) I don't see any value to arguing about Christian Schwarz's
Raul> words as if they're some scripture handed down from an
Raul> unreachable god. If the idea has merit he can explain his point
Raul> of view, or we can re-engineer based on the underlying issues.
I have seen no support for outlawing packages mentioning the 4
rth digit. This is not only gospel, it also makes sense.
This discussion is very silly. I shall not comment on this
thread again.
manoj
--
My rage is not malicious; like a spark of fire by steel enforced out
of a flint it is no sooner kindled, but extinct. -- Goffe
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
