Your message dated 03 Dec 1998 18:27:41 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packaging-manual_2.5.0.0_i386.changes INSTALLED
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 1997 21:08:43 +0000
Received: (qmail 19352 invoked from network); 14 Dec 1997 21:08:30 -0000
Received: from nymphe.m.ISAR.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by 205.229.104.5 with SMTP; 14 Dec 1997 21:08:29 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by nymphe.m.ISAR.de (8.8.7/8.8.7/nymphe-2.1) with UUCP id WAA05303
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 22:16:24 +0100 (CET)
X-Authentication-Warning: nymphe.m.ISAR.de: Umonet set sender to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by monet.painters.schwarz-online.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA26682
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 21:55:48 +0100
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 21:55:47 +0100 (CET)
From: Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg: packaging manual: time stamps should be preserved
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.4.0.19
The following has been approved with Policy Weekly posting #4. Please
include it the Packaging Manual.
BTW, shouldn't the Packaging Manual be distributed via dpkg-dev, instead
of dpkg? I mean, not all people who use dpkg will need this manual.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Thanks,
Chris
-----------cut-here-------------
Topic 7: Leaving time stamps unmodified
STATE: APPROVED
Most of our packages `touch' files in the packaging process (that is, the
modification time of the files gets reset to the current time). It would
be nice if the modification time of the upstream source would be
preserved.
For example, you could recognize that some documentation is very old by
looking at the modification time. (Of course, this only works if the
upstream maintainer kept the original modification time.)
According to a recent discussion on debian-policy on this subject we
consider this topic as `nice-to-have', but without priority. Maintainers
are encouraged to keep the original time stamps, though.
I suggest that an appropriate note is added to the Packaging Manual.
-----------cut-here-------------
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Don't know Perl? [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
http://www.perl.com http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
