debian-policy  

Messages by Thread

• • Bug#1005357: marked as done (developers-reference: fix formatting issues in French translation) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual package: wayland-session Simon McVittie
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual package: wayland-session Russ Allbery
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual package: wayland-session Sean Whitton
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual package: wayland-session Stephan Lachnit
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual package: wayland-session Andrei POPESCU
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual package: wayland-session Stephan Lachnit
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual package: wayland-session Bill Allombert
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual package: wayland-session Stephan Lachnit
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual package: wayland-session Andrei POPESCU
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual packages: wayland-session, x-session Simon McVittie
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual packages: wayland-session, x-session Bill Allombert
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual packages: wayland-session, x-session Sean Whitton
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual packages: wayland-session, x-session Simon McVittie
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual packages: wayland-session, x-session Matthias Geiger
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual packages: wayland-session, x-session Sean Whitton
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual packages: wayland-session, x-session Simon McVittie
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual packages: wayland-session, x-session Sean Whitton
  • Bug#1004522: debian-policy: Proposing new virtual packages: wayland-session, x-session Matthias Geiger
• Processed: limit source to debian-policy, tagging 999566 Debian Bug Tracking System
• developers-reference_12.2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of developers-reference_12.2_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Vincent Lefevre
  • Bug#1002626: marked as done (debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Bill Allombert
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Vincent Lefevre
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Sean Whitton
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Vincent Lefevre
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Russ Allbery
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Vincent Lefevre
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Russ Allbery
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Guillem Jover
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Russ Allbery
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Sean Whitton
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Russ Allbery
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Vincent Lefevre
  • Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Vincent Lefevre
  • Processed: Re: Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Processed: Re: Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#1002626: marked as done (When Rules-Require-Root: no, packages should not fail to build as non-root) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processed: tagging 542288 Debian Bug Tracking System
• Question on the use of "/nonexistent" Jason Franklin
  • Re: Question on the use of "/nonexistent" Russ Allbery
  • Re: Question on the use of "/nonexistent" Jason Franklin
  • Re: Question on the use of "/nonexistent" Russ Allbery
  • Re: Question on the use of "/nonexistent" Bill Allombert
  • Re: Question on the use of "/nonexistent" Jason Franklin
  • Re: Question on the use of "/nonexistent" Marc Haber
  • Re: Question on the use of "/nonexistent" Jason Franklin
  • Re: Question on the use of "/nonexistent" Marc Haber
• Bug#685506: Reach out to www.debian.org Geert Stappers
• Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnote Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnoteo Bill Allombert
  • Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnoteo Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnoteo Bill Allombert
  • Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnoteo Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnoteo Holger Levsen
  • Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnote Bill Allombert
  • Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnote Sean Whitton
  • Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnote Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnote Sean Whitton
  • Processed: Re: Bug#999826: debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnote Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#999826: marked as done (debian-policy: fix Build-Depends footnote) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processed: tagging 685506 Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Processed: tagging 685506 Debian Bug Tracking System
• Re: Bug#999598: dpkg-dev: Can we have binary package descriptions back for source uploads? Holger Levsen
  • Re: Bug#999598: dpkg-dev: Can we have binary package descriptions back for source uploads? Petter Reinholdtsen
• Bug#999566: debian-policy: highlight source code examples Stéphane Blondon
  • Bug#999566: marked as done (debian-policy: highlight source code examples) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Re: I don’t understand. Andrew M.A. Cater
• Bug#998282: Please make Section a required field for the source paragraph in d/control Felix Lechner
  • Bug#998282: Please make Section a required field for the source paragraph in d/control David Bremner
  • Bug#998282: Please make Section a required field for the source paragraph in d/control Felix Lechner
  • Bug#998282: Please make Section a required field for the source paragraph in d/control Felix Lechner
  • Bug#998282: Please make Section a required field for the source paragraph in d/control Russ Allbery
  • Bug#998282: Please make Section a required field for the source paragraph in d/control Guillem Jover
• Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Mattia Rizzolo
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Sean Whitton
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Mattia Rizzolo
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Bill Allombert
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Mattia Rizzolo
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Mattia Rizzolo
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Holger Levsen
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Mattia Rizzolo
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Sean Whitton
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Mattia Rizzolo
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Guillem Jover
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Sean Whitton
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Mattia Rizzolo
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Russ Allbery
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Sean Whitton
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Nicholas D Steeves
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Simon McVittie
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Russ Allbery
  • Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph Russ Allbery
• Bug#998063: debian-policy: New virtual package: {default-,}dbus-system-bus Simon McVittie
  • Bug#998063: debian-policy: New virtual package: {default-,}dbus-system-bus Adam Borowski
  • Bug#998063: debian-policy: New virtual package: {default-,}dbus-system-bus Simon McVittie
  • Bug#998063: debian-policy: New virtual package: {default-,}dbus-system-bus Sean Whitton
  • Bug#998063: debian-policy: New virtual package: {default-,}dbus-system-bus Simon McVittie
  • Bug#998063: debian-policy: New virtual package: {default-,}dbus-system-bus Sean Whitton
  • Bug#998063: Bug #998063: debian-policy: New virtual package: {default-,}dbus-system-bus Luca Boccassi
  • Processed: Re: Bug#998063: debian-policy: New virtual package: {default-,}dbus-system-bus Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#998063: marked as done (debian-policy: New virtual package: {default-,}dbus-system-bus) Debian Bug Tracking System
• developers-reference_12.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of developers-reference_12.1_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Re:Re: 3D printing part TLTPrototype
• Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas Simon McVittie
  • Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas Ansgar
  • Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas Sean Whitton
  • Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas Ansgar
  • Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas Simon McVittie
  • Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas Holger Levsen
  • Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas Sean Whitton
  • Bug#994008: debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas Russ Allbery
  • Bug#994008: marked as done (debian-policy: Clarify relationship between source and binary packages' archive areas) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#968154: Bug#968000: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: Get policy release dates in another way Felix Lechner
• Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Phil Morrell
  • Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Jérémy Lal
  • Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Jonas Smedegaard
  • Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Jonas Smedegaard
  • Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Simon McVittie
  • Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Paul Wise
  • Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Bastien Roucariès
  • Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Adrian Bunk
  • Bug#907051: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams Phil Morrell
• developers-reference_12.0_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of developers-reference_12.0_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#337086: marked as done (provide a link to the Debian Security Manual) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#793633: marked as done (developers-reference: discuss how to handle backports) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processed: Bug#337086 marked as pending in developers-reference Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#337086: provide a link to the Debian Security Manual Marco Villegas
  • Bug#337086: provide a link to the Debian Security Manual Holger Levsen
• Bug#934527: Sphinx conversion needs to take care appendix etc. Geoff
• Processed: Bug#793633 marked as pending in developers-reference Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Processed: Bug#793633 marked as pending in developers-reference Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Processed: Bug#793633 marked as pending in developers-reference Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Processed: Bug#793633 marked as pending in developers-reference Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Processed: Bug#793633 marked as pending in developers-reference Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processed: limit source to debian-policy, tagging 992601 Debian Bug Tracking System
• debian-policy_4.6.0.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of debian-policy_4.6.0.1_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Re: Debian Policy 4.6.0.0 released Sean Whitton
  • Re: Debian Policy 4.6.0.0 released Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
  • Re: Debian Policy 4.6.0.0 released Russ Allbery
  • Bug#992601: Allow non-64-bit packages to install to /usr/lib64/ again Sean Whitton
  • Bug#992601: Allow non-64-bit packages to install to /usr/lib64/ again Simon McVittie
  • Bug#992601: Allow non-64-bit packages to install to /usr/lib64/ again Russ Allbery
  • Bug#992601: marked as done (Allow non-64-bit packages to install to /usr/lib64/ again) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Re: Debian Policy 4.6.0.0 released Jochen Sprickerhof
• Bug#992414: debian-policy: upgrading-checklist is not upgraded Drew Parsons
  • Bug#992414: marked as done (debian-policy: upgrading-checklist is not upgraded) Debian Bug Tracking System
• debian-policy_4.6.0.0_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#944920: marked as done (Revise terminology used to specify requirements) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#932696: marked as done (Please document Haskell team style Vcs-Git sytax) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processing of debian-policy_4.6.0.0_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#991984: Please document minimal environment variable needed for sensible-utils Bastien Roucariès
  • Processed: Please document minimal environment variable needed for sensible-utils Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#991984: More information Bastien Roucariès
  • Bug#991984: Please document minimal environment variable needed for sensible-utils Russ Allbery
  • Bug#991984: marked as done (Please document minimal environment variable needed for sensible-utils) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#991984: closed by Russ Allbery <[email protected]> (Re: Bug#991984: Please document minimal environment variable needed for sensible-utils) Bastien Roucariès
  • Bug#991984: closed by Russ Allbery <[email protected]> (Re: Bug#991984: Please document minimal environment variable needed for sensible-utils) Edward Little
• Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Felix Lechner
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Sam Hartman
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Cyril Brulebois
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Sam Hartman
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Felix Lechner
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Bill Allombert
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Felix Lechner
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Bill Allombert
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Felix Lechner
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Felix Lechner
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
  • Bug#992136: Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Bug#992136: Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages Russ Allbery
  • Bug#992136: Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages Holger Levsen
  • Bug#992136: Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages Russ Allbery
  • Bug#992136: Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages Cyril Brulebois
  • Bug#992136: Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages Russ Allbery
  • Bug#992136: Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages Holger Levsen
  • Bug#992136: Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Bug#992136: Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Processed: Re: Bug#992136: Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#992136: marked as done (Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Standards-Version for udeb packages) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Felix Lechner
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Sean Whitton
  • Re: Bug#991533: lintian: please forget about required-field Standards-Version for udeb packages Cyril Brulebois
• See Idk3a Lê's real-time location on Google Maps Idk3a Lê (via Google Maps)
  • See Idk3a Lê's real-time location on Google Maps Idk3a Lê (via Google Maps)
  • See Idk3a Lê's real-time location on Google Maps Idk3a Lê (via Google Maps)

• Earlier messages
• Later messages