Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That you consider your proposal primary as an alternative to be
> considered by a committee that only steps in if the policy group
> fails is also something that worries me a lot.
Well, don't worry then, that's not primary, that's just a backup plan.
A worst-case scenario. And the rest of your logic falls apart, since
it hinges on the ridiculous theory that I didn't make this proposal
because it was the solution I wanted to see implemented.
So, do you actually have any comments about the PROPOSAL?
cheers
--
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
