Hi, >>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Santiago> On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Anthony Towns wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 08:12:20AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote: >> > It was my understanding that this situation could be resolved in the same >> > fashion that the man and info transitions were. By making the docs viewing >> > programs aware of both the old and new locations, and back porting them >> > into slink, the broken tools issue is resolved. >> >> AFAIK, it's just not possible to make Apache (and other web browsers) >> make both /usr/doc and /usr/share/doc accessible at the one >> http://localhost/doc URL. Santiago> So: is this the only *technical* reason for the proposed symlink farm? No. Santiago> I will be very disappointed if the *technical* committee Santiago> decides a change in each and every maintainer script in Santiago> every package just because a single package is unable to Santiago> look for docs in two different directories. Relax. You are not dissapointed. manoj -- Those on fire with desire follow the stream of their desires, like a spider follows the strands of its self-made web. Breaking the bond, the wise walk on free from longing, and leaving all suffering behind. 347 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
