Dale Scheetz wrote: > It was my understanding that, like the man and info transitions, these > problems are resolved by giving the tools the knowledge of the dual > locations. Our current binary dependencie scheme is sufficient to deal > with "incremental upgrades". Those packages that use the new location only > need depend on the "fixed" version of the viewer for a smooth incremental > upgrade.
This was my initial proposal to debian-policy, oh, a month ago. People shot it down for various silly reasons. Feel free to adopt it, that'd make me happy. But it has currently *not* been agreed on, and if the committe doesn't do something to address it, it will not be addressed. -- see shy jo
