Previously Steve Robbins wrote: > The current policy document does not make explicit that packages ought > to aim to be "compatible" with FHS, rather than "compliant".
We don't aim to be fully compliant though. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
