On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Steve Robbins wrote: > > The current policy document does not make explicit that packages ought > > to aim to be "compatible" with FHS, rather than "compliant". > > We don't aim to be fully compliant though.
I know the *current* aim is "compatibility". That's what's written in the proposed text. Or are you saying that Debian will *never* aim for "compliance"? I got the idea that compliance was some sort of far-away goal. If I'm wrong, the text can be changed to reflect this. -Steve
