On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 10:34:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Policy evidently never got updated to reflect the new "serious" severity. > Straightforward patch follows: > > --- policy.sgml.old Sun Mar 25 22:33:31 2001 > +++ policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 22:33:52 2001 > @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ > </p> > <p> > These classifications are roughly equivalent to the bug > - severities <em>important</em> (for <em>must</em> or > + severities <em>serious</em> (for <em>must</em> or > <em>required</em> directive violations), <em>normal</em> > (for <em>should</em> or <em>recommended</em> directive > violations) and <em>wishlist</em> (for <em>optional</em>
Seconded. (Why would anyone want to object to this, when it's current practice already?) -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
