On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:52:33AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > These classifications are roughly equivalent to the bug > > ^^^^^^^ > > > > - severities <em>important</em> (for <em>must</em> or > > > > + severities <em>serious</em> (for <em>must</em> or > > > > <em>required</em> directive violations), <em>normal</em> > > > > (for <em>should</em> or <em>recommended</em> directive > > > > violations) and <em>wishlist</em> (for <em>optional</em> > > > What about important severity? I would suggest the following: > > *shrug* Does it matter? I'm not worried either way. > Heh, such a casual attitude is seldom in evidence when you're reading > *other people's* policy proposals, especially mine...
Oddly, I care more about changes to meaning than just expression. But no, "It's all a plot against Branden" is a much better explanation. Let's go with that instead. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
