On Wed, 29 May 2002 23:56:11 +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, now that we separate woody and unstable, it is time to think about > this. IMO, this is not a gcc only thing. So propably it should be > changed in dpkg/policy first. debian-<cpu>-linux-gnu and > <cpu>-linux-gnu come to mind as an alternative. If a build process needs to know what is on the linux kernel is the GNU software or not, use build dependency. I don't care if <cpu>-linux-gnu is aliasd to <cpu>-linux and <cpu>-linux-gnu is preferred to <cpu>-linux, but I object to mandating <cpu>-linux-gnu in the policy.
-- Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian developer PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695 I always put away what I take. --- Ryuji Akai, "Star away" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
