On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 08:14:19PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 03:41:45PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > In light of recent changes, I suggest that policy should instead say: > > How about we just remove the whole section? The software now makes it clear > that the old stuff is a bug, and it's not like we need the Policy Manual > to say "fix the obvious bug".
I personnaly do not like policy to depend to much on software behaviour. What if gcc developer receive so many complains that they decide to reinstate it in gcc-3.4 ? Maybe we should wait a bit before remove it ? See how many packages are affected, what feed back we get, etc... Documenting it is no more supported is fine for me of course. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here.
