On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:46:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Holger Levsen <[email protected]> writes: > > > sadly this didden happen in 2003-2009, but I'd like this to become a > > reality for our next release sometime in 2010 or hopefully not 2011 ;-) > > > > Any takers? (To propose this as a release goal & bringing this into policy.) > > This was one of the things that I was hoping to get into the next release > of Policy, so I'm definitely in favor.
Is there actually packages that does not use debconf ? Should we draft an exception for the few situation where debconf is unavailable ? (e.g. dpkg and glibc before debconf is installed) Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
