Le Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:22:46PM +0100, Neil McGovern a écrit : > > Yes. If a maintainer is taking more that for a *RC* bug fix, then they > *should* keep the buglog updated with status.
Talking about the GCC 4.6 “*RC bugs*”, I got one other report telling that Debian's GCC 4.6.1 will introduce more failures. Then why do we need to act in emergency and fix all the 4.6.0 bugs within 7 days ? Can't you tolerate us to collate both transitions, without having to put placeholders bugs in the BTS ? I still do not understand why pressure is given to answer in 7 days, which is at most one full week-end, for non-urgent issues. We lose energy, trying to be too much ahead of upstream's work. I read a lot of complains on -devel that the manpower is short for the release, but please consider that it is short elsewhere as well. Please chose carefully your words in a way that does not call for wasting it. Cheers, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110503215713.ga28...@merveille.plessy.net
