On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:31:20PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Didier Raboud <[email protected]> (04/05/2011): > > The proposed wording doesn't imply this IMHO; I read it as "if you > > can't find an action from the maintainer on the buglog in the last 7 > > days, you can 0-day NMU". > > > > What we want is more something along the lines of "If the bug is > > older than 7 days without any maintainer activity /at all/, you can > > 0-day NMU". > > > > I don't think we can expect maintainers to ping their RC bugs on a > > weekly basis, just to repeat "I'm working on a proper fix, it takes > > time, don't NMU please". Perhaps we need a "willfix" or > > "dont-nmu-please" tag… > > > > -- > > OdyX > > reading Jakub's answer, I realized it could indeed be understood this > way. I'll be happily seconding any wording clarifying that. >
Happy to take phrasing updates, but I would be keen to ensure that a maintainer can't just ack a bug, and then leave it for months. Perhaps something that means a maintainer needs to say 'I expect this to be done by $foo' and $foo + 1 week would be the deadline? Neil -- <ari> show me on the doll where cdbs touched you -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
