Roger Leigh <[email protected]> writes: > However, it was my understanding from the discussion that the proposals > being discussed here are basically about how best to realise the goal of > having build-arch and build-indep implemented; I thought that the goal > itself was relatively uncontroversial, but the means of achieving it > were still under discussion.
Bill has said that he doesn't agree with the long-term goal of making the targets mandatory. So far as I know, he's the only one who's said that in the discussion, but he's right that the tech-ctte hasn't made a decision on that yet, and it's probably fair to say that his stated disagreement does make it controversial. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
