On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael Biebl <[email protected]> writes: >> How will "service" behave? > > service already handles upstart directly. It presumably could and should > be extended in an equivalent way to handle systemd. I don't think that > needs to be spelled out in Policy, since service is not an interface that > (at least at the moment) is standardized in Policy.
FWIW, service doesn't handle well the situation where we're running sysvinit but there's an upstart job installed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636054 It's an implementation detail, though, I guess it could be fixed in time. Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANVYNa-kz_BUCf=p+rcspfstedinj+xkhwu1buha5qv+o4a...@mail.gmail.com
