On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 10:45:35AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > Which locales don't currently have charsets mapping to Unicode? > > Could we remove the non-UTF-8 locales which /do/ have complete > UTF-8 coverage and replace them with aliases? That would at least > achieve the transition for the vast majority of locales.
The way locales work, this would prevent people to read text files written under such an encoding. Not an option I think. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130305105740.GD4285@yellowpig
