On 30-03-13 06:11, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 01:32:50PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : >> >> The fact that we don't have a solution (yet) doesn't mean we don't want >> a solution, nor does it mean we should give up. "wontfix" is for things >> that the maintainer disagrees is a problem; surely you don't think that >> is the right attitude here. >> >> While I can understand your desire to limit the number of open requests >> to the policy group, and even share it to some extent, I don't think you >> should close bugs just because immediate discussion doesn't find a solution. > > Hi Wouter, > > the problem with this bug (#701081) is that we do not even have an agreement > on > what the problem is. And without a problem, it is hard to find a solution. [...]
Okay, fair enough. I still think it is wrong to close the bug in that situation, but given this explanation I understand the reasoning; and I am not a policy editor, you are ;-) -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
