On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:27:51AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Bill Allombert wrote: > > Would that description be OK: > > > > httpd-wsgi A WSGI capable HTTP server > > > > Are there other developper maintaining WSGI related packages to second > > this ? > > I second the above description. > > I (co-)maintain uwsgi, which is capable of serving HTTP (via Apache2 but > also) on its own, and handle (a lot of protocols including) WSGI. > > On a related note, it probably makes sense to add similar note for PSGI > and maybe other protocols too (not sure how widespread other ones are), > but that's outside the scope of this bugreport, I guess.
Thanks Jonas. Piotr and Stefan, you still did not say whether it was OK for you. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140730095938.GB17330@yellowpig
