On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:49:55PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > Also what you are saying ("a package that is reproducible according to the > policy definition must not show up as non-reproducible in tracker/DDPO based > on results from the reproducible infrastructure") doesnt really makes sense: > if a package shows up as unreproducible somewhere, it's not reproducible > according to our definition!
Again, reproducible means that it _can_ be reproduced. As long as a well-know process allows to reproduce the package, it is reproducible. What you define is a different concept that deserve a different name. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.