>>>>> "IJ" == Ian Jackson <[email protected]> writes: IJ> That doesn't seem to be an answer to Sean's question. Why do you want IJ> the question of redundant dependencies dealt with in policy ? What IJ> bad things are happening, or might be likely to happen, because it is IJ> not mentioned ? Because I want to know if it is wrong or not. If it is wrong then I will tell the person who did it it is wrong when I see it. If it is not wrong, then I will keep my mouth shut.
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double listing: ... 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
- Processed: Re: Bug#809383: mention explici... Debian Bug Tracking System
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double list... Sean Whitton
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double ... 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly dou... Bill Allombert
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly... 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
- Bug#809383: mention expli... Bill Allombert
- Bug#809383: mention e... 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly dou... Ian Jackson
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly... 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
- Bug#809383: mention expli... Ian Jackson
- Bug#809383: mention explicitly double ... Russ Allbery
- Bug#809383: marked as done (mention explic... Debian Bug Tracking System

