Hi, Nik writes:
> i consider it a bug that mol depends on mol-modules, This does make sense to me. mol is not functional without its modules. > and the packages which provide this are modules for 2.2.18 + 2.2.19 > kernels Actually, I narrowed this down to 2.2.19 only. It only makes sense to create mol-modules packages for kernels with kernel-image packages. And it is even impossible for kernels without kernel-source packages. To my knowledge, only 2.2.19 meets both criteria. > perhaps mol-modules-source should also provide "mol-modules"? I don't think so. mol-modules-source doesn't provide mol-modules, it provides the means of building packages which in turn provide mol-modules. If you're running into funny conflicts with this, you're not doing it right. You should create a local repository of Debian packages and put your own kernel-image in there and a mol-modules package to go with it. Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je p�zqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!
