Hi, Mark Brown writes:
> > perhaps mol-modules-source should also provide "mol-modules"? > I'd question having the dependancy in the first place, though - > nothing else with similar needs (lm-sensors for example) does that > and it is unhelpful if one doesn't wish to use kernel-package. You have a point there that I first overlooked. Still, I would like to keep a dependency expressing that mol needs its kernel modules to function. This does come at a price (namely, installing three unnecessary kernel modules) for users who decide to bypass the package system. But I think it is preferrable to leaving out vital components of a piece of software by default. Regards, Jens. -- J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe! Le veux aimeb et mqubib panz je p�zqbpbe je djuz tqtaj!
