On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Sunday 17 August 2003 10:06, Martin-�ric Racine wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Frank Murphy wrote: > > > On Saturday 16 August 2003 10:00, Martin-�ric Racine wrote: > > > > > > > I'd be interested to know what the linux scancodes and X keycodes > > > > > > > are for these keys on i386 Linux. Are you able to try these on a > > > > > > > PC? If so, try these commands on both: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > # from the console, then press the <>| and ��� keys > > > > > > > $ showkey -s > > > > > > > $ showkey -k > > > > > > > > > > > > See attached files. > > > > > > > > > > OK, I need you to annotate these files. Write in the codes that you > > > > > get depending on which key you press. Otherwise, it's just guesswork > > > > > for us. > > > > > > > > It's as much guesswork for me. I press them in the order: normal, > > > > shift, altgr. first lesser/greater/pipe, then paragraph/half/degree. > > > > > > Well, you knew the order in which you pressed the keys, I didn't. Try it > > > again, but this time, only press the <>| (no Shift or Alt) and record the > > > output (should be a pressed/released pair). Then do the same for ���. > > > Then send the results here labeled with what keys you pressed. > > > > Getting those glyphs _require_ usage of shit and altgr,as they are on the > > same key! > > I'm not interested in the glyphs. I'm interested in the keyboard scancode you > get when you press the key.
AH! That is much more precise. So, only two keypresses. OK. I'll get them done in the evening. -- Martin-�ric Racine http://www.pp.fishpool.fi/~q-funk/
