According to Michael Schmitz, on Thu, 27 May 2004 10:41:43 +0200 (CEST), >> > First, I would suggest using cpufreqd, for scaling down to 400MHz >when> > you don't need full power. I can send you a working config if >needed.> > cpudynd does not seem necessary. >> >> I've installed it, but it appears to require power management daemons >> that conflict with pmud, such as apmd. Is pmud not the recommended >power> management utility for Mac laptops? > >Sure is, please file a bug report to make it depend on either pmud, >pbbuttonsd or apmd (we seem to need a virtual package powermgmt-daemon >RSN). > >If there's additional work to be done on pmud, I'm willing to work with >the cpufreqd maintainer to sort this out. > > Michael >
No cpufreqd does not depend on neither pmud, apmd or pbbuttond, it only uses kernel interfaces : either /proc/apm, /proc/pmu, /proc/acpi or sysfs equivalent. I already repied this to Rory offlist : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache depends cpufreqd cpufreqd Depends: debconf Depends: libc6 Moreover I looked at the code while tracking a missing fclose, and the only stuff needed by cpufreqd is /dev/pmu, but not at all pmud. cpufreqd speaks directly to the kernel. Maybe you just did not set the good driver in /etc/cpufreqd.conf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep pmu /etc/cpufreqd.conf pm_type=pmu #(acpi, apm or pmu) -- Cedric > -- Cedric "[Of course] I'm French! Why do think I have this outrageous accent, you silly king-a?!" Monty Python and the Holy Grail
