> What crap? You're the one who implied that these were > somehow kernel headers. They're not. They come with > the glibc-headers package. > > It really doesn't matter how this is fixed. It could be > fixed in the glibc-headers package. Alternately, the > kernel source could be made more friendly toward the > generation of glibc-headers. Obviously, one method is > much easier to implement, but either will do.
That still doesn't make these an API for user programs. I'll file a bug agains glibc-kernelheaders to remove these inlines as they're not supposed to be useable from user programs if that's the only way to shut people like you up.
