On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 18:18 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote: > On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 17:24, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Please point to the equally-optimized alternative > > > that works on all platforms. > > > > If there is none, then rip off the kernel implementation or lobby glibc > > to provide one, or make a "libunaligned.so" and distribute it etc... > > > > but to NOT rely on the kernel header, that is bogus. > > Unless someone is using the -I option with gcc, this > is NOT a kernel header. It comes with glibc-headers. > It is therefore a glibc header. :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> apt-cache show glibc-headers W: Unable to locate package glibc-headers E: No packages found [EMAIL PROTECTED]> dpkg -S /usr/include/asm/unaligned.h linux-kernel-headers: /usr/include/asm/unaligned.h [EMAIL PROTECTED]> apt-cache showsrc linux-kernel-headers Package: linux-kernel-headers Binary: linux-kernel-headers [...] > One could argue that the actual bug is that the #ifdef > is not getting removed in the creation of the glibc-headers > package. Might be true if it was indeed glibc-headers, but then it would have to be removed including anything it contains... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
