On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:38 +0200, sascha brossmann wrote: > @albert: concerning UFS, all i ever heard was recommendations against > using it unless being absolutely forced to because of some legacy > software, so i never considered.
If you'd even consider using FAT, then UFS will do. UFS is just about identical to ext2 in terms of feature set and on-disk structure. Ext2 was designed as a UFS clone with the VAX-era cruft removed. The only question of interest: has anybody set up the Linux UFS driver to handle MacOS X yet? The driver needs to know the byte order and needs to know if some features (32-bit UID, file type codes, etc.) may legitimately be used. Some old Mac apps might have a little trouble, but hopefully that won't be too serious for $HOME usage. For example, you get case sensitivity. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
