[Replying only to -project, since there's *ABSOLUTELY NO POINT* in having something on -private when it's already on -project.]
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 05:50:08PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > Openoffice documents are classified as Opaque, thusly cannot be > > distributed under the GFDL nor included in Debian under this > > scheme. Nor can word documents, etc... > > Fair point. Mako, is this something that's been raised with the FSF > in your ctte? The FSF has been made aware of the issues with the current version of the GFDL's definition of Transparent and Opaque works, yes. > I'm not sure I need to define documentation. We aren't robots, we > can make judgement calls on what is, or is not, documentation. But what, pray tell, will we base this "judgement call" upon? Don Armstrong -- Any excuse will serve a tyrant. -- Aesop http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
