>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> [2] qmail is always redistributed at no or very-low cost and
Raul> almost always in source form. Source can be retained
Raul> indefinitely, and can be redistributed indefinitely.
Cost has little to do with free as the DFSG defines it, so
this is a bit of a red herring. May one distribute modified versions
of the software? May one distribute binary copies?
Raul> [3] qmail is the best option available -- no one has cared enough to
Raul> write a free replacement that provides qmail's security, performance,
Raul> stability and features.
You shall get arguments about that. I postfix markedly
inferior? And the non freeness of qmail does detract from the
suitability of using it in Debian.
Raul> Personally, I'm considering proposing a constitutional amendment which
Raul> provides specific exceptions to clauses 3 and 4 of the DFSG, and related
Raul> guidelines (such as FHS) for Dan Bernstein's software.
You have an uphil task before you to convince me of the
desirability of this GR.
manoj
--
I don't know why, but first C programs tend to look a lot worse than
first programs in any other language (maybe except for fortran, but
then I suspect all fortran programs look like `firsts') Olaf Kirch
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
