On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 14:29, David Nicol wrote: > > So when is someone of the "qmail is unacceptable because DJB's > in-practice license grant does not meet strict qualifications" camp > going to write an equivalent drop-in replacement?
I don't think a drop-in replacement makes much sense. Qmail blatantly disregards the FHS, and as such wouldn't integrate with Debian well. If someone wants to spend their time on such a beast, well, more power to them, but I don't think it's very useful. As far as a functionally equivalent program goes, well, we have postfix.
