Andrew Suffield writes: > My response is simply this: it's lies. I challenge anybody who thinks > otherwise to present evidence. I sign almost all my outgoing mails; > this should be easy, if it were true. Find mails from me that "are > little more than provocations, put-downs, and trolls". Not ones where > people have interpreted it that way and I've either told them they're > wrong or ignored them. Ones where it's actually true. Post references > to this thread. See how many you *actually* get, out of the number of > mails I send.
You asked, and so a little bit of Googling produces these: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg01598.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/06/msg00166.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/05/msg00036.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/04/msg00248.html perhaps http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2005/03/msg00378.html (which I would call devoid of useful information but heavy in insults) Lately, I try to not make note of people behaving badly; there are too many instances for worrying over it to be healthy, and most people balance it out over time. Even though I personally tend to ignore Andrew Suffield, I think an organized effort to killfile _anyone_ is a misguided application of social pressure. If the alleged misbehavior is not so systematic that everyone can see it, it is not bad enough to warrant ostracism. Michael Poole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
