Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It's not possible for those of us not on -private to figure out what's > going on, really, but is it possible that it wasn't made public in an > effort to protect Andrew's privacy?
It's possible. If so, I would have expected a short notice to -private rather than cc'ing a personal message to Andrew. > Were I a listmaster, that would've > been one of my considerations, regardless of what he'd done to justify > the ban. I think it's potentially important that the rest of us know > some disciplinary action has been taken, but I can't say that it's > relevant to, say, his future employers. Is there anyone who wouldn't hire Andrew because he was *punished* for a post, rather than because of the post? The "lesbians" post was public and GPG-signed, after all. I think some developers are still looking to get even with Andrew Suffield since last summer (for what's described in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00968.html after DD Roger Leigh linked it to this months's events) or maybe even before that. Religious intolerance reflects more badly on debian than the minority. Help stop it, please. > (M-F-T: set to -project, *please* reply there.) (Done manually. M-F-T is a broken non-standard.) -- MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
