On Wednesday 21 June 2006 10:42, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > So to back up your assertion that I couldn't possibly have missed it > could you please provide some references to the lots of times it's > apparently been mentioned before?
AFAIK it has previously only been posted in the open bug against the TC for this issue (#366938).
pgpimHwGQI5hY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
