On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 23:47:12 -0400, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> That is true. However this ammendment substancially changes the
> section that talks about SPI, so it would be reasonable to have
> SPI's board look at it if they so desire. At best they could find
> some text that ought to be tweeked, and at worst they could have no
> input.
As individuals, people who make up the board of SPI can
already put in their input. Officially, the SPI board has no say
here -- as individuals, they have the same rights as everyone else.
> This ammendment is in no real hurry, as it mearlly re-affrims the
> status quo, and tweeks a few related lines.
> Of course it is your ammendment, so it is your decision.
Quite right. The DPL can, of course, extend the minimum
discussion period, under our constitution.
manoj
--
Never eat at a place called Mom's. -- Nelson Algren
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
