Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > If MjR has issues with the company Debian-UK (or any other alike > organization) he buys his t-shirts from, then he should mention it to > this organization's board, and the ethics of the company should be > questioned. Optionally we could set-up a Debian wiki page to remind to > Debian related non profits that some companies they may buy goods for > may be quite eager to look away when it comes to how their goods are > created.
I believe it's most efficient to apply this bugfix at the highest level possible. So, I try Debian (the licensor) before trying individual licensees one at a time. I'd try to fix a memory leak in a library by fixing the library in preference to trying to work around it in every program. There was also some information-gathering in my request and it seems this question is being lost: Do we have any knowledge about whether current debian clothes are products of forced child labour? > But yes I believe that Debian is making software and has no point in > taking such positions. [...] The project has already taken a position by licensing its trademark to some traders and not others. Anyone who believes it has no point in taking such positions should be working to either revoke or public-license it. Do we know anything more than http://www.debian.org/trademark about our licensees? Are there other licensees not listed there? Regards, -- MJ Ray http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html tel:+44-844-4437-237 - Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, consumer and workers co-operative member http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ - Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
