On ma, 2008-01-28 at 13:45 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > [many words, which I do not wish to summarize]
I'd like to say at this point that I pretty much agree with what Zack wrote, so I won't comment on that directly. Anthony's objection seems to be primarily that the BTS should already suffice, so all the additional infrastructure we've set up is unnecessary. I can see his point. I don't think the BTS as it currently exists suffices, but if a working summary feature is added to it, I am not objecting to using the BTS. The mechanics of DEP infrastructure are not an essential part of our DEP0 proposal, after all. I'd rather not wait for BTS changes to happen, though, before going on with using DEP for something real (a DEP1 that is). The infrastructure is less important than trying out the new process for real. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
